19 December 2007
Bonny Marie
17 December 2007
Head Trauma
My first reaction in these situations is to recoil, to shut up and keep to myself and not say a word, not because I don’t want to tell people or allow others to sympathize but because I don’t know how to say it. I don’t know how to be eloquent and meaningful with my words in these cases. I feel awkward and stupid, like everything that comes out is some form of word vomit, desperate for sentiment but completely lacking.
When my grandmother died last year, I think the number of people I physically told is so few, I could count them on one hand. My friend Justin was visiting from Seattle. He kept text messaging and calling me the day she died. I didn’t have the heart to pick up the phone, nor the words to express my pain, so I basically ignored him. I wrote him back at one point in the afternoon to tell him, My grandma is really sick and things are crazy with my family. I’ll keep in touch. She had been dead six-and-a-half hours by then, and I didn’t keep in touch.
It’s not that I didn’t expect him to be sympathetic. He would have been very kind about the whole thing, and was kind, in fact, under the impression she hadn’t passed yet. He was genuine, though I was deceiving him in my crazy, personal defense mechanism. It was almost like I couldn’t tell him the truth without having the words to articulate the extent of my sadness. I would rather be left alone in my grief, though I wanted the company and support, than to lamely inform him of something that should be so much more significant than I’m able to express.
But I wish you were here for me to tell you. I wouldn’t mind just blurting it out all at once with no special language, but all the emotion in the world. I know you would understand, too. I know that you understand how special our little girl is and what a presence she is in this family. You would understand our sense of loss and appreciate how we mourn. You’d understand the balance between letting me fold myself into your arms, and letting me have my space.
My mom has an irrational fear of flying. It’s an admittedly irrational fear. She knows it is, openly acknowledges it, but it doesn’t make the process any easier. She takes her “doggie downers” an hour before take-off like clockwork, and keeps the bottle of pills tucked safely into the seat pocket in case of turbulence, mild or severe. She’s got a relaxation CD uploaded onto her iPod that literally talks her through take-off, landing, and any number of unexpected events in flight—like an unexplained flash of the Fasten Seat Belt sign.
It’s difficult for Mom to help others understand her fear. Others think it’s funny, or frustrating. It’s easier not to go into detail about it, so she doesn’t. No one is any closer to understanding why she feels the way she does, but at least she doesn’t get frustrated herself.
The most difficult thing is watching my dad suffer. We suffer together, but he is very alone in many ways. My dad has always been the strong one—absolutely emotional and feeling, but in our estrogen-driven family, he keeps a sense of equilibrium. There are few deaths that would affect him quite so specifically. One occurred last year. We never in a thousand years expected a second just a year later. The relationship is so very, very different. It’s almost more heartbreaking that way. This little baby is a Daddy’s Girl through and through. From day one he was Alpha, she thought she was Beta. My poor dad. My heart breaks twice for him.
And he can’t say the words either. He can’t call his sister, his best friend. He can’t call them up and just say it. How do you say it? How do you tell them without breaking down completely? He’s about to lose his running companion, the tail that literally wagged the dog with excitement at the top of the stairs when he came home from work each day, his third child, in essence. He must explain what he’s going to lose. He must face them, and in facing them, he faces the truth of it. You’re far away—you aren’t even here for me to face. It’s easier and harder that way, all at the same time.
Times like this clarify how truly empty words are. No matter how hard I try, it will not be possible for me to explain how I am affected right now. I cannot communicate the extent of my impending sense of loss or make you feel what I’m feeling. A very unique little light in my world is flickering off, and there is no way I can effectively convey my pain in words.
Language is limited. Language is vast, it is varied, and theoretically I should be able to mold words in such a way as to force you to feel, see, hear, smell, taste my pain. I should be able to take these bottled emotions and allow them to explode onto a blank page, somehow resulting in heartbreaking, life-changing genius. My descriptions should be so vivid that you understand you are the one I want right now, why you are the one who could make things all right.
But I don’t know how to be lovely and tragic and verbally intriguing. I don’t have the energy or the focus to wrangle words and shape sentences in such a way that I might express the inexpressible. I’m tired and beaten.
Bonny is dying. I need you.
12 December 2007
A review I'd never send
Okay. Honestly, where do I begin? You’ve frustrated me all semester as you’ve managed to irritate, patronize, nearly insult, and absolutely intrigue me all at once. You’re a regular Mr. Darcy and as I’m sure you can imagine, girls do not like having a Darcy in their lives because we all know how that story turns out in the end. It’s much more comfortable to go on at odds with someone who makes you feel goaded than it is to buck it up and admit to yourself that you’re semi-attracted to them, on whatever level.
To be frank, your writing tends to induce in me the same reactions our interactions do. Generally speaking, I walk away feeling itchy and like I want to shake my fist at you, partially because there are some really great, well-constructed things going on that I truly appreciate, and partially because you have the capacity to come off as pretentious, self-indulgent, and ostentatious. You are an anomaly to me.
You're well-spoken. You have an impressive vocabulary and you carry yourself well, both in person and on the page. I acknowledge the subjectiveness of art, and that's how I've managed to keep myself under control now and then throughout the semester when all I've wanted to do was reach across the classroom, latch my hands around your neck, and shake vigorously. Unfortunately, I'm sure I only wanted to strangle you more when you looked especially nice in class that day. Whatevuh.
I think something that frustrates me about your writing-- and this fiction piece in particular-- is the fact that I recognize similarities in our styles, tastes, and habits. For example, I am a comma whore. I sprinkle commas throughout my writing, especially when I'm writing prose, and I'm afraid most of my interjections set off by commas are confusing and relatively unnecessary. I noticed this in your piece. Breaking up these lengthy sentences and varying the sentence structure would be beneficial, I think.
Something that severely bothered me was your grand total of six paragraphs in a 14-page piece of fiction. It was slowly killing me. I felt like I was suffocating. I'm begging you-- break up your story into paragraphs. It makes it more managable, and playing with specific breaks in paragraphs can really emphasize points effectively.
Your careful use of profanity was really attractive. I cannot tell a lie.
There were three very obvious parts to your piece: Jack's parents' history and his childhood; Nam; and post-Nam New York. I would have liked to have seen these three sections flow more easily one to another. As it stands, I feel a little bit like I read three different stories about the same guy that didn't relate as well as I know they were intended to. I think the exposition about Jack's parents was a little too lengthy-- I was really interested in Jack once we "finally" got around to his story, and seeing as he was the main character, I think there was too much said about his parents. It made it confusing for me at first who was going to be the main character.
Another misleading element was the phrase "Jack's third tour in Vietnam would prove to be his last." That to me indicates that he's going to die in Vietnam, and at that point in the story I'm not invested enough in his character to want to keep reading. Be careful to really say what you mean. Semantics is a slippery subject, but very important to consider!
Watch yourself that you don't use the same phrase or word too often, particularly not twice in a paragraph unless you're absolutely certain you mean to say it. Example: "rest of his days." It's cliche anyway. Come on. You can do better than that! Speaking of language, I wasn't entirely sure how to read your piece. The use of "you" indicated a conversational, familiar tone, but other times it felt more formal. I think I wanted to be more removed from the story so I could see the action and not just be informed what was going on.
Don't get me wrong. You had some very lovely work going on in this piece too. Some of your imagery was extremely vivid and sensory. You description of Cracker after his death, for example, was gorgeous and revolting (again with your contrary nature!!). It was a well thought-out piece, and had some heartbreaking moments (like selling his father's farm). When you were sensory, boy howdy were you sensory. I looooooooooooooooooooooooved the use of Gershwin's lyrics in the rising action. It really helped to set the pace of the story, and added to the frantic, chaotic nature of the moment. It was also effective irony that I very much appreciated.
I think what ends up frustrating me the most is the fact that it's already good and I want it to be just that much better. You obviously have the talent and capability to churn out some really impressive stuff, and you're certainly not lacking in creativity. You have a tendancy to project your emotions as very precious in your writing, but your writing is best when it's raw, and gory, and hard to swallow. I definitely think this story has the potential to be developed into a longer, more detailed narrative. I'm quite sure most of the critique I dish out is as specific as it is because I see it in my own writing too.
I'm not a hatemonger. In some, deep-down sort of way, I hope my frustration has been somewhat mutual. I truly do value your opinions and comments (even if they can be way off the mark-- but hey, at least you prove your ability to commit to an interpretation, and that's admirable too), and have always looked forward to hearing what you had to say all semester. Maybe it's because I tend to be outspoken myself, but yours is among the few opinions I've actually been curious to hear whenever I've written something for workshop. I can't help but be suspicious that my sentiments are returned.
Go ahead. Look up my number on stalkernet. Assuming I can ovecome this prideful prejudice I've conjured all semester, and you can set aside any aloof, uppity attitude you project, I think we'd actually get along. Care to prove me wrong?